As all of our primary casualty insurance programs are unbundled for claims and loss control, we regularly see insureds that want to make a change in their third party claims administrator (TPA). Such changes occur for a variety of reasons, including service issues, cost implications, adjuster technical expertise, demographics, and change in the needs of the insured. The process of selecting and changing TPAs can be demanding with many issues to consider, including the right service fit, transition timelines, contractual commitments, and regulatory implications.
Once a decision is made to change TPAs and a new one is selected, how does an organization ensure a successful transition? Given the complexity, it’s important that the insurer is made aware of potential TPA changes as early in the process as possible. It’s also important to take the time to get it right. Consider the following list as a good starting point for planning the transition.
Each transition is unique and requires its own distinct set of challenges. While strong communication and coordination with all parties is critical, with proper planning and a strong RFP, the transition should go smoothly.
Another major concern in changing TPAs is the conversions of claims data from one TPA to another. Look for Part II of our “Changing TPAs” series, where we’ll detail specifics for a successful transition of claims data from one TPA to another.
The ORRM Claims Department contributed to this article.
The Underwriting Consultant Group provides in-house technical underwriting support for Old Republic Risk Management. The group is responsible for setting and communicating underwriting guidelines for the company, working closely with the Product Development and Compliance Department. The Underwriting Consulting Group is based out of our corporate office in Brookfield, WI.